<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 46 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered the appellant engaged in construction activities to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs within eight weeks, pursuant to section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. This decision was made after considering arguments regarding service tax liability on construction activities and the interpretation of relevant legal provisions. The pre-deposit requirement aimed to ensure compliance with statutory obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 13:42:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 46 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered the appellant engaged in construction activities to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs within eight weeks, pursuant to section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. This decision was made after considering arguments regarding service tax liability on construction activities and the interpretation of relevant legal provisions. The pre-deposit requirement aimed to ensure compliance with statutory obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>