<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 44 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329446</link>
    <description>Where search and seizure under the NDPS Act proceed on prior information, compliance with Section 42 is mandatory, including recording the information, forwarding it correctly to the superior officer, and recording reasons for a night search. The Court found a mismatch between the recorded information and the information sent upward, and no valid reasons for the night search were shown. Section 43 did not apply because the vehicle was a private jeep and there was no reliable material to treat it as a public conveyance. On those facts, breach of Section 42 vitiated the prosecution case and the acquittal was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 44 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329446</link>
      <description>Where search and seizure under the NDPS Act proceed on prior information, compliance with Section 42 is mandatory, including recording the information, forwarding it correctly to the superior officer, and recording reasons for a night search. The Court found a mismatch between the recorded information and the information sent upward, and no valid reasons for the night search were shown. Section 43 did not apply because the vehicle was a private jeep and there was no reliable material to treat it as a public conveyance. On those facts, breach of Section 42 vitiated the prosecution case and the acquittal was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>