<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 249 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4003</link>
    <description>The High Court Bombay upheld the Tribunal&#039;s authority to impose penalties under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, and affirmed its discretion to review such penalties. The appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any legal issues for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 249 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4003</link>
      <description>The High Court Bombay upheld the Tribunal&#039;s authority to impose penalties under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, and affirmed its discretion to review such penalties. The appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any legal issues for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>