https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184174 The Tribunal's treatment of the section 10A claim was confined to factual verification and it did not finally decide the issue on merits; the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further clarification. As no substantive adjudication had been made on the section 10A question, no substantial question of law arose for appellate interference. The appeals were therefore dismissed as lacking merit. en-us Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jul 2016 12:59:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184174 The Tribunal's treatment of the section 10A claim was confined to factual verification and it did not finally decide the issue on merits; the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further clarification. As no substantive adjudication had been made on the section 10A question, no substantial question of law arose for appellate interference. The appeals were therefore dismissed as lacking merit. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184174