<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Trademark Fee Case: Direct Link Between Revenue and Royalty Payments to Associated Enterprise for Brand Use Established.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30035</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing issue w.r.t. to payment of trademark fee - there exists a direct nexus between the revenue earned by the assessee and the payment of royalty made to the associated enterprise for using brand name, and therefore, it would be incorrect to analyze the transaction of payment of royalty in isolation. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 12:44:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 12:44:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Trademark Fee Case: Direct Link Between Revenue and Royalty Payments to Associated Enterprise for Brand Use Established.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30035</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing issue w.r.t. to payment of trademark fee - there exists a direct nexus between the revenue earned by the assessee and the payment of royalty made to the associated enterprise for using brand name, and therefore, it would be incorrect to analyze the transaction of payment of royalty in isolation. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 12:44:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>