<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 31 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329433</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 was not justified as the assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Court agreed with the adjustment of excise duty in the closing stock under Section 145A, citing legal precedents and emphasizing that deductions under Section 43B are allowable upon actual payment. The appeal favored the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 31 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329433</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 was not justified as the assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Court agreed with the adjustment of excise duty in the closing stock under Section 145A, citing legal precedents and emphasizing that deductions under Section 43B are allowable upon actual payment. The appeal favored the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>