<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 21 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329423</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals on most grounds, directing the deletion of various adjustments and disallowances made by the assessing officer and Transfer Pricing Officer. The tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the payment of trademark fees, Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) expenses, machinery repair expenses, provision for warranty, and advertisement expenditure. Some issues were set aside for verification, and the appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 21 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329423</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals on most grounds, directing the deletion of various adjustments and disallowances made by the assessing officer and Transfer Pricing Officer. The tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the payment of trademark fees, Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) expenses, machinery repair expenses, provision for warranty, and advertisement expenditure. Some issues were set aside for verification, and the appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>