<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 186 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3998</link>
    <description>The court held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal erred in law by setting aside the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s order under section 263. It was found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was indeed erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests due to a lack of proper inquiry. The court emphasized the need for a fresh assessment with proper inquiry and observance of natural justice. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, the Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed unsustainable, and the judgment was retained in the file and record of connected appeals with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 186 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3998</link>
      <description>The court held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal erred in law by setting aside the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s order under section 263. It was found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was indeed erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests due to a lack of proper inquiry. The court emphasized the need for a fresh assessment with proper inquiry and observance of natural justice. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, the Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed unsustainable, and the judgment was retained in the file and record of connected appeals with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>