<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1111 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329402</link>
    <description>In a monthly tax regime, limitation for best-judgment assessment must be computed period-wise from the due date of each monthly return, so earlier monthly periods may become time-barred even if the assessment order is passed later. A show cause notice followed by a reasonable opportunity to respond was treated as sufficient compliance with natural justice, and the authority was not required to await a reply beyond the stipulated time. Writ jurisdiction remains supervisory, so factual findings of the appellate authority will not be disturbed absent perversity or reliable material showing error. The assessment was therefore liable to be interfered with only to the extent of the time-barred period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 21:17:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1111 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329402</link>
      <description>In a monthly tax regime, limitation for best-judgment assessment must be computed period-wise from the due date of each monthly return, so earlier monthly periods may become time-barred even if the assessment order is passed later. A show cause notice followed by a reasonable opportunity to respond was treated as sufficient compliance with natural justice, and the authority was not required to await a reply beyond the stipulated time. Writ jurisdiction remains supervisory, so factual findings of the appellate authority will not be disturbed absent perversity or reliable material showing error. The assessment was therefore liable to be interfered with only to the extent of the time-barred period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>