https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329397 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal challenging the rejection of a partnership firm's refund claim by the Commissioner (Appeals). The refund claim of Rs. 5,27,265 was deemed time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, while the rejection of the refund claim of Rs. 25,733 for non-production of documents was set aside for reevaluation. The case was remanded for further review, directing the appellant to submit all relevant documents for proper assessment and the adjudicating authority to issue a reasoned order in accordance with the law. en-us Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jun 2016 20:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329397 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal challenging the rejection of a partnership firm's refund claim by the Commissioner (Appeals). The refund claim of Rs. 5,27,265 was deemed time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, while the rejection of the refund claim of Rs. 25,733 for non-production of documents was set aside for reevaluation. The case was remanded for further review, directing the appellant to submit all relevant documents for proper assessment and the adjudicating authority to issue a reasoned order in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329397