https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184167 Condonation of delay requires a satisfactory showing of sufficient cause, and an unexplained or unsupported lapse will not justify entertaining a belated challenge. Here, the explanation for a 233-day delay in filing the special leave petition was found unsatisfactory because the petitioner knew of the impugned order shortly after delivery, took no timely steps, and produced no material to support the claimed inability to act during a visit to India. In consumer dispute matters, the need for prompt adjudication further weighed against acceptance of the delayed petition. The delay was not condoned and the special leave petition was dismissed as time-barred. en-us Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:05:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184167 Condonation of delay requires a satisfactory showing of sufficient cause, and an unexplained or unsupported lapse will not justify entertaining a belated challenge. Here, the explanation for a 233-day delay in filing the special leave petition was found unsatisfactory because the petitioner knew of the impugned order shortly after delivery, took no timely steps, and produced no material to support the claimed inability to act during a visit to India. In consumer dispute matters, the need for prompt adjudication further weighed against acceptance of the delayed petition. The delay was not condoned and the special leave petition was dismissed as time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184167