https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329395 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by upholding the demand of Service Tax for the normal period, dropping the demand for the extended period, and waiving the penalty. The decision was based on the interpretation of Notification No. 34/2004-ST and the absence of suppression of facts by the appellant, leading to the conclusion that the extended period demand and penalty were not justified. en-us Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Dec 2016 11:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329395 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by upholding the demand of Service Tax for the normal period, dropping the demand for the extended period, and waiving the penalty. The decision was based on the interpretation of Notification No. 34/2004-ST and the absence of suppression of facts by the appellant, leading to the conclusion that the extended period demand and penalty were not justified. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329395