<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1103 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329394</link>
    <description>The Tribunal accepted information obtained under the RTI Act as valid evidence of the main contractor&#039;s payment of service tax, relieving the subcontractor of liability to pay service tax on subcontract charges. The decision highlighted the significance of verifying such information and applying established legal principles in determining service tax responsibilities in subcontract arrangements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1103 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329394</link>
      <description>The Tribunal accepted information obtained under the RTI Act as valid evidence of the main contractor&#039;s payment of service tax, relieving the subcontractor of liability to pay service tax on subcontract charges. The decision highlighted the significance of verifying such information and applying established legal principles in determining service tax responsibilities in subcontract arrangements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>