<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 921 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184162</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deemed the proceedings initiated under section 158BD of the IT Act void ab initio for M/s Pransukhlal &amp;amp; Sons Jewellers due to lack of material indicating undisclosed income, resulting in the cancellation of the block assessment. However, for M/s Pransukhlal Brothers, the proceedings were validated based on a diary found during the search. In the block assessment proceedings, additions were limited to Rs. 1,49,842 for M/s Pransukhlal Jewellers and Rs. 13,72,257 for M/s Pransukhlal Brothers. The appeal for M/s Pransukhlal &amp;amp; Sons was allowed, while those for M/s Pransukhlal Jewellers and M/s Pransukhlal Brothers were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:37:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 921 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184162</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deemed the proceedings initiated under section 158BD of the IT Act void ab initio for M/s Pransukhlal &amp;amp; Sons Jewellers due to lack of material indicating undisclosed income, resulting in the cancellation of the block assessment. However, for M/s Pransukhlal Brothers, the proceedings were validated based on a diary found during the search. In the block assessment proceedings, additions were limited to Rs. 1,49,842 for M/s Pransukhlal Jewellers and Rs. 13,72,257 for M/s Pransukhlal Brothers. The appeal for M/s Pransukhlal &amp;amp; Sons was allowed, while those for M/s Pransukhlal Jewellers and M/s Pransukhlal Brothers were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>