<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1101 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s failure to declare cargo in the Import General Manifest (IGM) was not willful but an inadvertent omission. As there was no fraudulent intention and the law allowed for amendment of the IGM in case of bona fide mistakes, the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties were deemed unjustified. The Tribunal set aside the order of confiscation and penalties, allowing the appeals with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:14:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1101 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s failure to declare cargo in the Import General Manifest (IGM) was not willful but an inadvertent omission. As there was no fraudulent intention and the law allowed for amendment of the IGM in case of bona fide mistakes, the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties were deemed unjustified. The Tribunal set aside the order of confiscation and penalties, allowing the appeals with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>