<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1100 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329391</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of by remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for a thorough review as outlined. The appellant was granted a reasonable opportunity for a hearing to present their case effectively. The judgment underscored the significance of a meticulous examination of transactions to validate refund claims and ensure adherence to legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1100 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329391</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of by remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for a thorough review as outlined. The appellant was granted a reasonable opportunity for a hearing to present their case effectively. The judgment underscored the significance of a meticulous examination of transactions to validate refund claims and ensure adherence to legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>