<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 202 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the Commissioner of Central Excise&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that the appellants were entitled to re-credit the Cenvat credit amount that was wrongly reversed without needing permission, as there was no dispute regarding entitlement. The Tribunal criticized the erroneous advice from the Audit team and found the Revenue&#039;s demand unjust, ultimately granting relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 202 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the Commissioner of Central Excise&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that the appellants were entitled to re-credit the Cenvat credit amount that was wrongly reversed without needing permission, as there was no dispute regarding entitlement. The Tribunal criticized the erroneous advice from the Audit team and found the Revenue&#039;s demand unjust, ultimately granting relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>