https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184154 Evacuee property legislation was upheld as within legislative competence and constitutionally valid: the power to declare property evacuee property was treated as incidental to the scheme for custody, management and administration, the validating provision was read retrospectively, and the restrictions on ownership and disposal were not treated as unconstitutional. However, the Custodian's notice and vesting order affecting the petitioner's shares failed to disclose the statutory grounds with sufficient particularity and did not afford an effective hearing, so the statutory conditions precedent and natural justice were breached. The exclusionary clause did not bar constitutional review where want of jurisdiction or procedural illegality was shown, and the impugned action was quashed to that extent. en-us Wed, 11 Apr 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:28:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184154 Evacuee property legislation was upheld as within legislative competence and constitutionally valid: the power to declare property evacuee property was treated as incidental to the scheme for custody, management and administration, the validating provision was read retrospectively, and the restrictions on ownership and disposal were not treated as unconstitutional. However, the Custodian's notice and vesting order affecting the petitioner's shares failed to disclose the statutory grounds with sufficient particularity and did not afford an effective hearing, so the statutory conditions precedent and natural justice were breached. The exclusionary clause did not bar constitutional review where want of jurisdiction or procedural illegality was shown, and the impugned action was quashed to that extent. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 11 Apr 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184154