https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184153 Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was held applicable to an international commercial arbitration seated outside India unless expressly or impliedly excluded by agreement, and a Section 11 application for appointment of an arbitrator was therefore maintainable. However, the correspondence and receipt of payment as full and final settlement showed accord and satisfaction, with no pleading or proof of fraud, coercion, or misrepresentation. On those facts, the underlying claim was extinguished, no arbitrable dispute survived, and arbitration could not be invoked for the same demand. en-us Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 May 2019 13:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184153 Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was held applicable to an international commercial arbitration seated outside India unless expressly or impliedly excluded by agreement, and a Section 11 application for appointment of an arbitrator was therefore maintainable. However, the correspondence and receipt of payment as full and final settlement showed accord and satisfaction, with no pleading or proof of fraud, coercion, or misrepresentation. On those facts, the underlying claim was extinguished, no arbitrable dispute survived, and arbitration could not be invoked for the same demand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184153