https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329386 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, stating that the rejection of their refund claim based on export clearance percentage was incorrect. The tribunal clarified that the 50% export clearance requirement applied only to manufacturers filing refund claims multiple times in a quarter, not to all manufacturers. As the appellants met the conditions for the refund claim under the correct interpretation of the notification, the impugned order was deemed unsustainable, and the appeals were allowed. en-us Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Nov 2016 17:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329386 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, stating that the rejection of their refund claim based on export clearance percentage was incorrect. The tribunal clarified that the 50% export clearance requirement applied only to manufacturers filing refund claims multiple times in a quarter, not to all manufacturers. As the appellants met the conditions for the refund claim under the correct interpretation of the notification, the impugned order was deemed unsustainable, and the appeals were allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329386