<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1091 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329382</link>
    <description>The court upheld the confirmation of a redemption fine and penalty of Rs. 2.75 lakh each imposed on the appellant for unaccounted goods found during a search at the factory premises. The appellant&#039;s argument that the goods were received from a job worker and were awaiting inspection before entry in the register was dismissed. The judge found that the finished goods were present in the factory without proper entry in the register, supporting the imposition of the redemption fine and penalty. The appeal was therefore dismissed, affirming the decision of the adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:56:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1091 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329382</link>
      <description>The court upheld the confirmation of a redemption fine and penalty of Rs. 2.75 lakh each imposed on the appellant for unaccounted goods found during a search at the factory premises. The appellant&#039;s argument that the goods were received from a job worker and were awaiting inspection before entry in the register was dismissed. The judge found that the finished goods were present in the factory without proper entry in the register, supporting the imposition of the redemption fine and penalty. The appeal was therefore dismissed, affirming the decision of the adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>