<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 704 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the rejection of a refund claim for redemption fine and penalties on imported Blank Video Cassettes. The Tribunal held that the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply to these payments made during the proceedings. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal ordered the refund without delay, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions and directing the refund to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:47:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 704 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the rejection of a refund claim for redemption fine and penalties on imported Blank Video Cassettes. The Tribunal held that the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply to these payments made during the proceedings. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal ordered the refund without delay, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions and directing the refund to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>