https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184148 A contempt finding requires clear, intentional and contumacious disobedience of a court order; a delay caused by the ordinary administrative transmission or implementation of orders does not by itself amount to contempt. On the bond issue, a bond taken in substance to secure release of sale proceeds was valid even though no prescribed form existed and it was framed as an indemnity bond in favour of the Government of West Bengal, because it substantially complied with the Sessions Judge's direction. Acceptance of the bond by the Additional District Magistrate was not improper merely because the order referred to the District Magistrate, as the Criminal Procedure Code did not exclude the Additional District Magistrate's powers and the practice of the courts supported such acceptance. en-us Tue, 02 Jul 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:36:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184148 A contempt finding requires clear, intentional and contumacious disobedience of a court order; a delay caused by the ordinary administrative transmission or implementation of orders does not by itself amount to contempt. On the bond issue, a bond taken in substance to secure release of sale proceeds was valid even though no prescribed form existed and it was framed as an indemnity bond in favour of the Government of West Bengal, because it substantially complied with the Sessions Judge's direction. Acceptance of the bond by the Additional District Magistrate was not improper merely because the order referred to the District Magistrate, as the Criminal Procedure Code did not exclude the Additional District Magistrate's powers and the practice of the courts supported such acceptance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Jul 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184148