<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 998 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184143</link>
    <description>A deliberate false statement on oath in an affidavit filed before the Court was treated as criminal contempt because a knowingly false positive assertion can lower the authority of the Court and interfere with the administration of justice. The governing test noted was whether the conduct substantially interferes, or tends substantially to interfere, with the due course of justice. An unconditional apology was held insufficient to erase the contempt in the circumstances, although the seriousness of the conduct justified a moderate fine rather than a harsher penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:56:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 998 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184143</link>
      <description>A deliberate false statement on oath in an affidavit filed before the Court was treated as criminal contempt because a knowingly false positive assertion can lower the authority of the Court and interfere with the administration of justice. The governing test noted was whether the conduct substantially interferes, or tends substantially to interfere, with the due course of justice. An unconditional apology was held insufficient to erase the contempt in the circumstances, although the seriousness of the conduct justified a moderate fine rather than a harsher penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>