https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184140 Delay in land acquisition proceedings did not require quashing where public interest in planned development justified continuation of the acquisition, though eligible claimants were entitled to additional interest as directed by the Supreme Court. More than one award was held permissible under a single Section 6 declaration when separate holdings or interests required distinct determinations. Section 55 of the Delhi Development Act applied only where the particular land was actually designated in the Master Plan or Zonal Plan, so the acquisition could not be invalidated on that basis. A purported withdrawal under Section 48 was ineffective because it was not properly exercised or duly published. en-us Fri, 01 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 May 2017 15:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184140 Delay in land acquisition proceedings did not require quashing where public interest in planned development justified continuation of the acquisition, though eligible claimants were entitled to additional interest as directed by the Supreme Court. More than one award was held permissible under a single Section 6 declaration when separate holdings or interests required distinct determinations. Section 55 of the Delhi Development Act applied only where the particular land was actually designated in the Master Plan or Zonal Plan, so the acquisition could not be invalidated on that basis. A purported withdrawal under Section 48 was ineffective because it was not properly exercised or duly published. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184140