https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184136 Subsequent purchasers in land acquisition proceedings cannot claim a better title than the original owner, but they remain entitled to just compensation. Where the evidentiary record before the reference court was seriously deficient and the acquisition and compensation process showed collusive features, the Court itself reassessed the material and fixed a higher market value for the acquired lands. The text also states that the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) was unavailable because the relevant awards pre-dated the statutory amendment in context, while interest was disallowed for the period before possession and allowed thereafter, together with solatium on the enhanced compensation. An award made in excess of jurisdiction, and proceedings vitiated by fraud or collusion, were treated as correctable in execution. en-us Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:12:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184136 Subsequent purchasers in land acquisition proceedings cannot claim a better title than the original owner, but they remain entitled to just compensation. Where the evidentiary record before the reference court was seriously deficient and the acquisition and compensation process showed collusive features, the Court itself reassessed the material and fixed a higher market value for the acquired lands. The text also states that the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) was unavailable because the relevant awards pre-dated the statutory amendment in context, while interest was disallowed for the period before possession and allowed thereafter, together with solatium on the enhanced compensation. An award made in excess of jurisdiction, and proceedings vitiated by fraud or collusion, were treated as correctable in execution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184136