<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1922 (2) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184127</link>
    <description>Review under Order XLVII of the Code of Civil Procedure is a limited statutory remedy, confined to discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, and reasons analogous to those grounds. The residual phrase &quot;any other sufficient reason&quot; does not authorise a rehearing on the merits or correction of an earlier legal view simply because a different Bench may disagree. The rule on composition of the review court is also mandatory: where the Judge or Judges who passed the decree or order are available, a Judge who was not part of the original decision cannot hear the review. The review orders were therefore invalid and the original dismissal was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1922 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1922 (2) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184127</link>
      <description>Review under Order XLVII of the Code of Civil Procedure is a limited statutory remedy, confined to discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, and reasons analogous to those grounds. The residual phrase &quot;any other sufficient reason&quot; does not authorise a rehearing on the merits or correction of an earlier legal view simply because a different Bench may disagree. The rule on composition of the review court is also mandatory: where the Judge or Judges who passed the decree or order are available, a Judge who was not part of the original decision cannot hear the review. The review orders were therefore invalid and the original dismissal was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1922 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>