<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 210 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3983</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order reducing the penalty and restored the penalty imposed by the original order. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, emphasizing the importance of upholding penalties in cases of evasion and gross violations of statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 210 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3983</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order reducing the penalty and restored the penalty imposed by the original order. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, emphasizing the importance of upholding penalties in cases of evasion and gross violations of statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>