<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1069 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329360</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscation, redemption fine, penalty, and re-export order of slag due to lack of conclusive evidence confirming its hazardous nature. The decision emphasized the necessity of substantiated findings and legal sustainability in confiscation cases involving alleged hazardous materials, favoring the appellant based on the absence of a test report and reliance on assumptions by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1069 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329360</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscation, redemption fine, penalty, and re-export order of slag due to lack of conclusive evidence confirming its hazardous nature. The decision emphasized the necessity of substantiated findings and legal sustainability in confiscation cases involving alleged hazardous materials, favoring the appellant based on the absence of a test report and reliance on assumptions by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>