<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1065 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329356</link>
    <description>A repeal does not extinguish an SEZ exemption where the successor statute saves accrued rights and existing notifications and directs references to the repealed sales tax law to be read as references to the new VAT law. On that construction, the exemption for a developer or entrepreneur using goods for authorised operations continued under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and the prior exemption notification remained valid and enforceable because it had not been rescinded or amended. The purchase tax assessments were therefore unsustainable, the assessment orders were quashed, and fresh assessment was directed with the exemption benefit extended.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1065 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329356</link>
      <description>A repeal does not extinguish an SEZ exemption where the successor statute saves accrued rights and existing notifications and directs references to the repealed sales tax law to be read as references to the new VAT law. On that construction, the exemption for a developer or entrepreneur using goods for authorised operations continued under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and the prior exemption notification remained valid and enforceable because it had not been rescinded or amended. The purchase tax assessments were therefore unsustainable, the assessment orders were quashed, and fresh assessment was directed with the exemption benefit extended.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>