<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Demand Overturned: Insufficient Evidence of Fact Suppression by Appellant; Extended Limitation Period Unjustified Without Proof.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29981</link>
    <description>Extended period of limitation - Apart from a bald allegation there is no evidence adduced by department to establish supression or mis-statement of facts. The relied upon documents as stated in the show cause notice itself, establishes that appellant is not guilty of suppression of facts or mis-statement. - Demand set aside - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:43:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:43:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Demand Overturned: Insufficient Evidence of Fact Suppression by Appellant; Extended Limitation Period Unjustified Without Proof.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29981</link>
      <description>Extended period of limitation - Apart from a bald allegation there is no evidence adduced by department to establish supression or mis-statement of facts. The relied upon documents as stated in the show cause notice itself, establishes that appellant is not guilty of suppression of facts or mis-statement. - Demand set aside - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:43:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>