https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329347 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand was time-barred due to lack of evidence of suppression or misstatement. The judgment emphasized the importance of support structures for installing capital goods and the appellant's genuine belief in the admissibility of the credit. The decision provided relief to the appellant based on legal principles and precedents cited during the proceedings. en-us Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:43:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329347 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand was time-barred due to lack of evidence of suppression or misstatement. The judgment emphasized the importance of support structures for installing capital goods and the appellant's genuine belief in the admissibility of the credit. The decision provided relief to the appellant based on legal principles and precedents cited during the proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329347