<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1049 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329340</link>
    <description>The High Court held that interest income earned on deposits for purchasing plant and machinery should be treated as a capital receipt to reduce the cost of the asset. The Court found that such income was directly linked to acquiring assets and was incidental to setting up the plant and machinery. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, disagreeing with the ITAT&#039;s decision, and allowed the Tax Appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1049 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329340</link>
      <description>The High Court held that interest income earned on deposits for purchasing plant and machinery should be treated as a capital receipt to reduce the cost of the asset. The Court found that such income was directly linked to acquiring assets and was incidental to setting up the plant and machinery. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, disagreeing with the ITAT&#039;s decision, and allowed the Tax Appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>