<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1048 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat purchases as wholly bogus and add the entire cost to income was deemed incorrect. Following legal principles, the disallowance was restricted to 25% of the cost of purchases for each year, balancing in favor of both the assessee and revenue. Consequently, the impugned order was modified, and the appeals were allowed partially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1048 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat purchases as wholly bogus and add the entire cost to income was deemed incorrect. Following legal principles, the disallowance was restricted to 25% of the cost of purchases for each year, balancing in favor of both the assessee and revenue. Consequently, the impugned order was modified, and the appeals were allowed partially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>