<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 82 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3977</link>
    <description>Delayed refund of unutilized Cenvat credit under Rule 5 attracts interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 once the refund application remains unattended beyond three months from receipt. The claim was treated as a refund claim carrying the statutory consequence of delay, and the argument that accumulated credit stayed with the assessee and could not earn interest was rejected. Unutilized credit was treated as duty lying with the Revenue until actually utilized, so interest became payable from the day after expiry of the three-month period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 82 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3977</link>
      <description>Delayed refund of unutilized Cenvat credit under Rule 5 attracts interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 once the refund application remains unattended beyond three months from receipt. The claim was treated as a refund claim carrying the statutory consequence of delay, and the argument that accumulated credit stayed with the assessee and could not earn interest was rejected. Unutilized credit was treated as duty lying with the Revenue until actually utilized, so interest became payable from the day after expiry of the three-month period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>