https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184096 A Municipal Committee that requested land acquisition for a public park had standing to challenge an order dropping the proceedings because the impugned order directly affected an acquisition undertaken for its benefit. The acquisition could not be treated as having lapsed or been abandoned without a valid withdrawal by the State Government under the governing land acquisition law. In the absence of material showing lawful withdrawal, the Collector had no competence to terminate the proceedings on a supposed lapse. The order dropping acquisition was therefore unsustainable, and the acquisition proceedings were directed to continue in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 15 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:09:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184096 A Municipal Committee that requested land acquisition for a public park had standing to challenge an order dropping the proceedings because the impugned order directly affected an acquisition undertaken for its benefit. The acquisition could not be treated as having lapsed or been abandoned without a valid withdrawal by the State Government under the governing land acquisition law. In the absence of material showing lawful withdrawal, the Collector had no competence to terminate the proceedings on a supposed lapse. The order dropping acquisition was therefore unsustainable, and the acquisition proceedings were directed to continue in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184096