<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1278 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184090</link>
    <description>Regular bail under section 37 of the NDPS Act depends on hearing the Public Prosecutor and the Court&#039;s satisfaction that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to reoffend. No contraband was recovered from the petitioner, the seizure was from a co-accused, and the co-accused&#039;s statements did not name the petitioner or show knowledge of the concealed narcotics. The petitioner&#039;s role was limited to invoicing and dispatch, and no material was shown to indicate a likelihood of reoffending, so the statutory requirements for bail were treated as satisfied and bail was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1278 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184090</link>
      <description>Regular bail under section 37 of the NDPS Act depends on hearing the Public Prosecutor and the Court&#039;s satisfaction that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to reoffend. No contraband was recovered from the petitioner, the seizure was from a co-accused, and the co-accused&#039;s statements did not name the petitioner or show knowledge of the concealed narcotics. The petitioner&#039;s role was limited to invoicing and dispatch, and no material was shown to indicate a likelihood of reoffending, so the statutory requirements for bail were treated as satisfied and bail was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>