<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 618 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184089</link>
    <description>Section 37 NDPS bail requires hearing the Public Prosecutor and satisfaction on two cumulative conditions: reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to reoffend while on bail, assessed on broad probabilities rather than meticulous proof. The commentary also notes that repeated use of the same alleged independent witnesses in multiple recoveries creates suspicion and materially weakens the prosecution case. It further explains that a statement recorded under Section 67 may be admissible if voluntary, but it can support conviction on its own only when its voluntariness and reliability are clear; otherwise, corroboration is needed. On the facts discussed, these features created doubt about the recovery and prosecution case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:49:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 618 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184089</link>
      <description>Section 37 NDPS bail requires hearing the Public Prosecutor and satisfaction on two cumulative conditions: reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to reoffend while on bail, assessed on broad probabilities rather than meticulous proof. The commentary also notes that repeated use of the same alleged independent witnesses in multiple recoveries creates suspicion and materially weakens the prosecution case. It further explains that a statement recorded under Section 67 may be admissible if voluntary, but it can support conviction on its own only when its voluntariness and reliability are clear; otherwise, corroboration is needed. On the facts discussed, these features created doubt about the recovery and prosecution case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>