<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 584 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184087</link>
    <description>Section 37(2) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 empowers the State Government, after necessary inquiry and consultation, to sanction a proposed modification of development control rules with changes and conditions, or to refuse sanction. The provision does not confine the Government to a mere approval role, as the sanction process forms part of delegated legislative activity. The statutory scheme also does not require a further hearing before sanction is granted, and principles of natural justice are not implied where the statute does not so provide. Promissory estoppel cannot be used to defeat a statutory amendment or rule having statutory force. The sanctioned modification was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 584 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184087</link>
      <description>Section 37(2) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 empowers the State Government, after necessary inquiry and consultation, to sanction a proposed modification of development control rules with changes and conditions, or to refuse sanction. The provision does not confine the Government to a mere approval role, as the sanction process forms part of delegated legislative activity. The statutory scheme also does not require a further hearing before sanction is granted, and principles of natural justice are not implied where the statute does not so provide. Promissory estoppel cannot be used to defeat a statutory amendment or rule having statutory force. The sanctioned modification was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>