<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 532 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184083</link>
    <description>Environmental disputes involving complex scientific and technological questions may be assisted by an expert environmental appellate body, which can investigate facts and provide technical opinion to aid constitutional courts; this reference does not create new jurisdiction but supports informed adjudication consistent with environmental protection and sustainable development. The precautionary principle also applies in environmental decision-making, so preventive action need not wait for full scientific certainty where there is a risk of serious or irreversible harm. In that setting, the burden lies on the developer or industrialist proposing the activity to show that it is environmentally safe and benign.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 532 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184083</link>
      <description>Environmental disputes involving complex scientific and technological questions may be assisted by an expert environmental appellate body, which can investigate facts and provide technical opinion to aid constitutional courts; this reference does not create new jurisdiction but supports informed adjudication consistent with environmental protection and sustainable development. The precautionary principle also applies in environmental decision-making, so preventive action need not wait for full scientific certainty where there is a risk of serious or irreversible harm. In that setting, the burden lies on the developer or industrialist proposing the activity to show that it is environmentally safe and benign.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>