https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184079 Article 31A(2) protects land reforms acquisitions only where the holding answers the constitutional meaning of "estate" under the existing law, including a jagir, inam, or similar grant. The cultivated portion would fall within the agricultural limb, but forest and waste land could not be added merely by stretching that category. On the historical material, the holding was treated as a fresh governmental grant, in substance a jagir or inam made for services rendered and supported by British authority. The impugned amendment and vesting notifications were therefore upheld as constitutionally protected, and the challenge failed. en-us Thu, 16 Jun 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:05:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184079 Article 31A(2) protects land reforms acquisitions only where the holding answers the constitutional meaning of "estate" under the existing law, including a jagir, inam, or similar grant. The cultivated portion would fall within the agricultural limb, but forest and waste land could not be added merely by stretching that category. On the historical material, the holding was treated as a fresh governmental grant, in substance a jagir or inam made for services rendered and supported by British authority. The impugned amendment and vesting notifications were therefore upheld as constitutionally protected, and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Jun 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184079