<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 1031 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184076</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellants Mahender Goyal, Vijay Saxena, and Arvind Kumar under the Customs Act, 1962. Insufficient evidence and lack of corroboration led to the overturning of the penalties, with the tribunal emphasizing the necessity for concrete evidence to establish liability. The judgment differentiated between the appellants, exonerating one due to the absence of evidence connecting them to the seized goods. Consequently, the penalties were revoked, and the appeals were allowed, providing relief to the appellants based on the inadequacy of evidence and uncorroborated statements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 1031 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184076</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellants Mahender Goyal, Vijay Saxena, and Arvind Kumar under the Customs Act, 1962. Insufficient evidence and lack of corroboration led to the overturning of the penalties, with the tribunal emphasizing the necessity for concrete evidence to establish liability. The judgment differentiated between the appellants, exonerating one due to the absence of evidence connecting them to the seized goods. Consequently, the penalties were revoked, and the appeals were allowed, providing relief to the appellants based on the inadequacy of evidence and uncorroborated statements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>