https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184072 An application for renewal under the proviso to Section 68F(1D) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is treated as a renewal application governed by the general procedure under Section 57 and the time limit in the proviso to Section 58(2). Because Section 58(3) permits consideration of a delayed renewal application only if it is filed within fifteen days after the prescribed date, that express limit excludes further condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Delay beyond fifteen days is therefore not condonable, and the renewal application may be rejected as time-barred. en-us Fri, 10 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jun 2016 10:02:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184072 An application for renewal under the proviso to Section 68F(1D) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is treated as a renewal application governed by the general procedure under Section 57 and the time limit in the proviso to Section 58(2). Because Section 58(3) permits consideration of a delayed renewal application only if it is filed within fifteen days after the prescribed date, that express limit excludes further condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Delay beyond fifteen days is therefore not condonable, and the renewal application may be rejected as time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184072