<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1030 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329321</link>
    <description>The court remanded the case to the Assessing Officer to determine if income from letting out a godown should be classified as business income and if interest paid to partners is a permissible deduction. The court emphasized the need for factual evidence regarding the intention to resume the business. The appeal was disposed of without addressing the original questions raised, as further assessment was necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1030 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329321</link>
      <description>The court remanded the case to the Assessing Officer to determine if income from letting out a godown should be classified as business income and if interest paid to partners is a permissible deduction. The court emphasized the need for factual evidence regarding the intention to resume the business. The appeal was disposed of without addressing the original questions raised, as further assessment was necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>