<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 82 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3968</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the demand for interest at Rs.1,000/- per day, allowing the appeal and holding that the interest already paid at 24% per annum satisfied the Revenue&#039;s demand under Rule 8(3), consistent with the Rajasthan High Court&#039;s ruling. The decision clarified the correct rate of interest applicable on delayed duty payments, aligning with the judicial interpretation provided by the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 82 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3968</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the demand for interest at Rs.1,000/- per day, allowing the appeal and holding that the interest already paid at 24% per annum satisfied the Revenue&#039;s demand under Rule 8(3), consistent with the Rajasthan High Court&#039;s ruling. The decision clarified the correct rate of interest applicable on delayed duty payments, aligning with the judicial interpretation provided by the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>