https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329307 The Tribunal ruled that the appellant, a manufacturer of industrial valves, did not qualify for duty exemption under Notification No.6/2002-CE as non-conventional energy devices. The appellant's claim was rejected as they were not primarily manufacturing non-conventional energy devices/systems specified in List No.9. The Tribunal emphasized that the fiscal benefit for non-conventional energy devices did not extend to the appellant's products. The appeal was dismissed based on the lack of evidence of manufacturing non-conventional energy devices, with the appellant directed to settle duty liability and any deficiencies, despite penalty immunity granted by the Commissioner (Appeals). en-us Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329307 The Tribunal ruled that the appellant, a manufacturer of industrial valves, did not qualify for duty exemption under Notification No.6/2002-CE as non-conventional energy devices. The appellant's claim was rejected as they were not primarily manufacturing non-conventional energy devices/systems specified in List No.9. The Tribunal emphasized that the fiscal benefit for non-conventional energy devices did not extend to the appellant's products. The appeal was dismissed based on the lack of evidence of manufacturing non-conventional energy devices, with the appellant directed to settle duty liability and any deficiencies, despite penalty immunity granted by the Commissioner (Appeals). Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329307