<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 517 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184059</link>
    <description>Vehicles leased out to a third party for being run on hire were treated as eligible for depreciation at the higher rate, following the earlier ruling on the same point. The Revenue&#039;s objection that the actual use of the vehicles by the lessee on hire had not been examined was not entertained because the point had not been raised before the Tribunal and was not the Assessing Officer&#039;s case. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s entitlement to higher depreciation was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:44:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 517 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184059</link>
      <description>Vehicles leased out to a third party for being run on hire were treated as eligible for depreciation at the higher rate, following the earlier ruling on the same point. The Revenue&#039;s objection that the actual use of the vehicles by the lessee on hire had not been examined was not entertained because the point had not been raised before the Tribunal and was not the Assessing Officer&#039;s case. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s entitlement to higher depreciation was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>