https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184054 A writ petition seeking regularisation was held unsuitable where the claim turned on disputed facts, including whether the workmen had completed ten years of continuous service and whether the documents proved identity and continuity of employment. The Court reiterated that a writ court should not adjudicate contested factual questions and that the earlier order only preserved recourse to remedies available in law, namely the statutory machinery under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The proper course was therefore to pursue the appropriate statutory remedy rather than invoke Article 226 for factual determination. en-us Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:16:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184054 A writ petition seeking regularisation was held unsuitable where the claim turned on disputed facts, including whether the workmen had completed ten years of continuous service and whether the documents proved identity and continuity of employment. The Court reiterated that a writ court should not adjudicate contested factual questions and that the earlier order only preserved recourse to remedies available in law, namely the statutory machinery under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The proper course was therefore to pursue the appropriate statutory remedy rather than invoke Article 226 for factual determination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184054