<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (11) TMI 172 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184051</link>
    <description>Disputes over whether the institutions were religious denominations, and whether they were private or public in character, were treated as disputed or mixed questions of fact and law. Such issues were considered unsuitable for determination in writ proceedings under Article 226 and were left open to be worked out before the competent civil court. The earlier view that the appellants could establish their claim in a proper civil forum was reaffirmed, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:06:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (11) TMI 172 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184051</link>
      <description>Disputes over whether the institutions were religious denominations, and whether they were private or public in character, were treated as disputed or mixed questions of fact and law. Such issues were considered unsuitable for determination in writ proceedings under Article 226 and were left open to be worked out before the competent civil court. The earlier view that the appellants could establish their claim in a proper civil forum was reaffirmed, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>