<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (8) TMI 89 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184049</link>
    <description>The right of appeal is a vested substantive right, but the strength of the Bench hearing the appeal is a matter of procedure. The earlier High Court Act regulated jurisdiction and business without creating a substantive right to a two-Judge hearing, and the later Kerala High Court Act validly enlarged the jurisdiction of a single Judge. No vested right existed to insist on a Division Bench hearing or to claim a further appeal under Article 133 on that basis, so the single-Judge disposal was upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:44:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (8) TMI 89 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184049</link>
      <description>The right of appeal is a vested substantive right, but the strength of the Bench hearing the appeal is a matter of procedure. The earlier High Court Act regulated jurisdiction and business without creating a substantive right to a two-Judge hearing, and the later Kerala High Court Act validly enlarged the jurisdiction of a single Judge. No vested right existed to insist on a Division Bench hearing or to claim a further appeal under Article 133 on that basis, so the single-Judge disposal was upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>